Headsup!

MUST READ: The Homeless Singapore Cat’s Life: Smalley in the Hedge
Do a good deed a day, it doesn’t take much of your time, just some mouse time
20090321: Petition: Say “NO” to whale sharks in captivity. (I did).
Homeseekers
20090326: Homeseeker: Freda 20090330: Homeseeker: Becky Homeseeker: Betsy

Click! Social Cause

2009 June 23

Please do help click the badgey to the right of blog posties, near the top. It’s for a cause. The bestest wordpress initiative: socialvibe

Don’t forget there’s more you can do: Click@Daily Good Deed

Appeal: Please help Fat Fat, the now paralysed cat.

2009 May 30
by calsifer

[EDIT 20090603: Fat Fat @ Blessing Home now]


Adorable Fat Fat

Adorable Fat Fat

Please help Fat Fat, the now paralysed cat. She’s an absolutely adorable and super affectionate from the Old Airport Road Killing Fields. Though her spine is broken in three places, she’s still a loving kitty with undampened spirits. Please read about her story here and see how you can help Fat Fat.

Thank you.

[NOTE: Comments disabled. Please go direct to the source for enquiries and clarifications]

Appeal: Cat hit by car in Jurong area

2009 May 13
by calsifer

[EDIT 20090519: Received update on Sunday, 20090517 that the cat has passed away.]


Just got this in the mail. Please help spread the word. Thanks

Subject: Cat hit by car in Jurong area
Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 02:57:58 +0800

Attached are the photos.

On the 8th May 09, a cat was hit by a car at Jurong West extention area, near to Xingnan primary school. The cat is a 2 year old tabby white male cat,unsterilise, and was rushed to The Joyous Vet to seek immediate treatment. One of the cat’s eye was swelling heavily due to the impact of the car and vomitted a lot of blood on the way to the vet.

Dr. Grace Heng attended to the cat and mentioned that she had to stitch up the swollen eye which may need to be remove if the swelling does not go down after 2 weeks. There is no other alternatives but to remove the eye.

The lower jaw was badly damaged also, thus the much bleeding on the way to the vet. The lower jaw has cracked and Dr. Heng has stitich up the broken jaw, which may or may not work for the cat to heal.

She mentioned that if the stitches holding the jaws loosen, the cat may need to go for bone surgery that is very costly and only done by certain vets.

A feeding tube also have to be inserted into the cat as force feeding may worsen the condition of the jaw that has cracked. It’s a tube that allows food to flow directly into the stomach, not through the mouth. The cat has difficulty chewing now as the mouth is very swollen and in great pain, at the same time stressing the cat badly when the nurse try to forcefeed him.

We are desperately in need of donations for this cat that had survived the accident as we are doing a lot of animal rescue work. We are trying our very best to raise funds for the cat’s medical bills and all donations will be answered to clearly with receipts from the vet that will be scan and email to kind souls who donate.

NO AMOUNT IS TOO SMALL AND EVERY SINGLE CENT COUNTS!

Please contact Kahyong @ 98176735 for the account number for donations for this poor cat, and kindly let me know who you are and the amount donated.

Please help to forward the email and feel free to email contact me through this email or hp if you have any enquiries about the cat. Thank you!

IMG_0748 Photo395

(NOTE: Comments are turned off. Please do contact persons in charge as stated in the appeal directly. Thanks. )

Local Animals Worried Fanatics Will Take Over SPCA

2009 May 13

(source)

This is so funny it’s not even cute when you think about the foundation it is built on, because there may just come a day this comes to pass, ala the AWARE saga.

Fanaticism and the self-righteous drive to make everybody convert or perish is not something new to me. I have passing awareness of the NARasitic plague inflicting the US. But I would never have thought it would be happening on any level worth worrying in staid old Singapore. How wrong I am.

Read this to the end, including the comments (which have very informative links, circulated correspondences, plus thoughts by proponents on both sides): The AWARE steeplejackers and their deep connections to Joel’s Army and American dominionists

A partial steeplejacked church checklist, which apparently started in the 1940s:

  • Features overtly anti-gay.homphobic stance/doctrine
  • Promotes publications by NAR authors/leaders
  • Forbids ancestral worship, traditions – collectively “generational curses”
  • Intercessory prayers
  • Promotes and encourages takeover of societal pinions like Government, Arts, Culture
  • Association or links in any way with Focus on the Family

Nobody’s safe from the insanity. Since I became aware of FotF (thanks to Josie Lau), I am highly disturbed that the TODAY tabloid has been featuring a column by Focus on the Family in its Voices section for ever. Even worse, FotF is actually a registered non-profit organisation in Singapore, apparently claiming itself non-religious. How did this ever come to pass?

For additional supporting references:

Note: I know, I know, I said the trilogy was the end of the affair but I just had to get this off my chest. So while I may come back to revise and update this, with this post the minionly focus on human affairs is closed. But while we attend to some real-life issues and try to juggle them with the kitty services, please bear with our slackerly rate of REAL updates.

AWARE Saga: Post-mortem

2009 May 6

What’s a post with a sequel but lacking a sequel’s sequel?

There’s a ton of information and blogs in cyberspace touching on it, so instead of saying what’s already carried all over the net, I’m going to link to choice sites/posts. But before that, let me jot down a few IMOs, which points are all supported by the linkages to come (in themselves just a sampling of the content online). Thereafter, we’ll get back to the pertinent issues – kitties, kitty pics and thoughts and concerns for the non-squabbling denizens of this earth.

  • Congratulations are in order for the new old-guard exco, but it also has its work cut out for it – engagement, progression, change.
  • The statements by religious leaders did do their bit in reigning in the potential “army of God” siege that could have kept the Josie Lau exco in place. (I saw a reference to an online letter to ST from a woman claiming to have decided to skip the EOGM after discussion with her cell group post Dr John Chew’s statement, but can’t find it now. If you see that, please paste the link in the comments section of this post, thanks!)
  • The media reports portrayed the old-guard supporters as rowdy, loud and rude. However, they left out how the eogm seemed to be organised to disadvantage them.
  • I am still having difficulties wrapping my head around the fact that such a takeover bid succeeded at all. This surely shows up inherent problems with AWARE, at least with regards to its structure? And I say this without any rancour, with the utmost respect for its achievements.
  • I am not a Christian nor am I considered religious by any definition, but neither do I feel all secular activities including the mundaneness called working for a living, can be totally devoid of an individual’s faith/belief system. There is no denying what every individual does or say is informed by that, it’s inherent in the human mind/psyche. My beef with the AWARE takeover was how religion seemed to be the motivation and core of it, even unto the way the volunteers were organised on the EOGM preparation earlier in the day and how the “red-shirts” seem to up and leave after the casting of the no-confidence vote.
  • The sudden flurry of protests by concerned parents to MOE about the AWARE CSE programme content reflects unfavourably on the protesters. Yes, no protest does not mean no problem. But the sudden outpouring of “outrage” manifest a herd mentality hinting at taking someone’s word at face-value rather than herd members learning (AND understanding) the truth for themselves.
  • The AWARE saga is not, and should not be, construed as a Christians vs the rest tussle. But it is hard not to view it as such given the facts of the case. Members on all sides of the divide can deduce any number of things, but it would boil down to:
    • Conservative/fundie Christians believing they are being discrinimated against for having to tolerate alternative views and not being able to force their agenda on others.
    • Non-christians of other religions beleiving they are are being marginalised for having to tolerate an aggressive Christian agenda/voice and for its imposition of its agenda on everyone else (section 377A anyone?)
    • Moderates of all persuasions who have been sandwiched and feel the impetus (for whatever reason) to keep silent rather than raise their concerns about the pro-active aggression characterising small segments of their belief systems.
    • Civil society must be free from politicking of all ilk or “agendas” to function objectively and healthily.
    • The world is really not just made up of “normal” people (aka religious people who are decree-abiding heterosexuals) vs”abnormal” people (aka irreligious people who are decree-breaking homosexuals), and there are OTHER stuff that commands the world’s human population’s attention. (There was a reference somewhere to women being more concerned with the economy and bread-and-butter issues than homosexuality. If you see that, please paste the link in the comments section of this post, thanks!). Leting a particular segment of the population string up another due to misunderstanding, fear, bias, discrimination is the first step down the road to ruin. Strictly speaking, it’s not like this is really the first step in this agenda, but does Singapore want to be dragged along?
    • The enthusiastic response to the K.F. Khoo petition demonstrate the power of faith. If only a portion of this enthusiasm could be harnessed for pressing issues of the day.
    • Secularism is not and cannot be the exclusive domain of atheists – it may be tempting and all too convenient but the “Godless” are not to blame for all the failings of the world but unless you’re that frog in the well, even that’s too narrow and myopic a view.
    • slightly off-topic but consider this: unless there is only ONE religion which also happens to condemn all unbelievers to hell, and exactly ONE belief system in the whole wide world complementing said religion, the only thing every human being can be sure of is the guarantee of feeling the heat at the end. Crispy or well-done? Come on, why so serious?

The EOGM REPORTS

COMMENTS and THOUGHTS

Media

Straits Times:

Today

TNP

Blogs

mrsbudak

Youth.sg

taikiew.net

akikonomu

Mr Wang Says So

To Fix A Mocking Peasant

Writing-Yoga-Living

Siew Kum Hong

Yawning Bread

The Wayang Party

The Online Citizen

For more: we-are-aware.sg

Aware Saga: COOS and the curious case of disingenuous-seeming platitudes

2009 May 1

My bit of rambling on the AWARE saga seemed fated to get a sequel. By now, it should be well-known that Pastor Derek Hong of the Anglican Church Of Our Saviour (COOS), which seems to be the unifying demographic in the collective profile of the new AWARE exco and then some (pdf alt), has raised a rallying war-cry to the women in his flock to ‘be engaged’ and support fellow church member and Aware president Josie Lau and ‘her sisters’ at Aware, claiming ‘it is not a crusade against the people but there’s a line that God has drawn for us, and we don’t want our nation crossing that line.’

What could be defined by the term “our nation” in the pastor’s mind, when Singapore is a secular sovereign state? Who makes up “our nation” he is commanding to not cross the “line that God has drawn” when Christians comprises 14.5% of Singapore’s population? The implications are nothing short of intriguing. (Pastor Hong is not the only COOS shepherd to urge his flock to support the new AWARE exco in the name of church and country).

If you have access to a copy, read what the good pastor said in today’s Straits Times. 2 and 2 apparently do not have to add up. Heck, compare it and the “outing” of the Group of 9 + 1 to his church’s “clarification” statement, and it gets even more confuzzling. Even COOS staff are getting in on the act. You can’t throw out the bath water without dashing the baby to the ground. So which is it, yea or nay?

Incidentally, it is very interesting that almost as soon as MOE issued a statement on the bone of contention by the Group of 9’s + 1, aka “Feminist Mentor”, and said it had not received complaints neither from her or the shocked parents she chewed the bone with, and the FM seemed certain of hanging by her own rope, it began poking the bone, and a newly launched petition by a Madam K.F. Khoo to request MOE to do the poking has garnered 1,200 signatures (scroll to post titled “Check Again”. Edit: This is a much better reference, with the originating email appeal in tow apparently).

EDIT: I am highly interested in the outcome of the MOE probe of course – will someone get a tap on the wrist? (Incidentally, the comments to the post are very interesting reads, involving self-styled concerned parents to boot.) And for balance, straight from the horse’s mouth: Notes from an AWARE CSE trainer

Additional references and choice reads:

A bit of rambling on the AWARE saga

2009 April 29

Strictly human affairs aren’t featured on tec for the simple reason of it being a minionly blog. But there are hiss spats, and then there are hiss spats. This is one of those that demands a bit of attention. It also requires more thought but I am pressed for time since the AWARE EGM is on 2 May so please bear with the rambling.

To set a bit of background: I am of the opinion that everyone has rights and freedom to choose, without fear of reprisals, persecution and discrimination, especially with regards to to personal basic stuff like sexual orientation, choice in abortion, gender equality, respect for others’ freedom to practise and express their opinions and beliefs. I cannot stand the imposition of one’s beliefs on another whether by force, stealth or other forms of coercion. This stems from my personal experience as a six year old who, along with with my younger sisters, was lured and “brainwashed” by a pair of  smiling young women Christian evangelists to “drive out” the false evil gods sitting in my home and accept the true god of Christianity or risk burning in hell. As children of practising Taoists, and having visited Haw Par Villa, the burning in hell bit did it. When they asked if we want to be saved, of course I said YES for all of us. We were told it was simple, that we only had to repeat what they said (which I know now to be prayers). Though a six year old who had barely started learning English, I grew more and more uncomfortable, not to mention scared and confused, at the things we seemed to be repeating, which seemed to include clauses for burning in hell for offending the Christian god in future. Thankfully, our mother swooped in before the deal was sealed and rescued us. I still remember the look of disappointment on the two women’s faces as our mother herded us away. Our mother was scared and angry of course, and tried to help us understand the enormity of what the two women had attempted when we got home. I felt sick then and prayed at the altar in our home for forgiveness and for assistance to drive out the evil god that I almost accepted. From then, I had bad dreams of being burnt in hell by the Christian god for the longest time. The incident happened while I and my sisters were out playing in the neighbourhood playground, just 20m away from our second storey 1-room flat, while waiting for my mother to return from errand running. It was a long time ago in an age when neighbourliness was such that every mother did the same. But after that incident, though she continued to allow us to run down to the playground ourselves, our mother made sure to keep an eye on us from the corridor – there goes the neighbourhood really. Now that I know, I feel nothing but pity and contempt for evangelists who prey on the naive, desperate and the weak in the name of their god or think the world must live by their creed. Talk about forced enlistment! How Religion Ruins Relationships so: why can’t people just accept people for what they are instead of trying to force-mould others to their truths?

With this tangling mess at AWARE, surely it shows the danger we are in from such fundamentalists.

IMG_4428

Time to stop hiding and take a stand, like Angel did.

The first I knew of the AWARE sage was this TODAY article (pdf alt. Comment on this article: AWARE: a civil society primer). I had really thought it was a storm in a teacup. But unfolding events show it is not so simple, and where the ilk of Thio Su Mein are involved, alarm bells must ring. Then I read that the DBS tie-up with Focus on the Family (which had seemed mildly insipid if a little unfathomable) was under the aupices of Josie Lau, new AWARE president in her capacity as DBS’ head of credit cards marketing. Back when it broke, I had thought it was a simple fluke that a secular organisation picked such a strongly anti-anything non-christian group which is hardly heard of in Singapore for their Corporate Social Responsibility gig.

(Side-track: This weekend past was a flag day for Focus on the Family. Asking money from the public of Singapore to fund their “work”. The cheek! People, please do pay attention to what you are contributing to.)

I also find Dawn’s take on the whole shenanigans insightful. (And I am touched that amid their work and focus, the members of AWARE extended their empathies during the SARS fiasco in 2003)

One other thing I have to mention about AWARE – when the SARS crisis happened, some AWARE members came forward to offer us their moral support. They felt that active volunteers involved in civil society should help each other out. If you’d like find out what you can do, go to We Are Aware.

mrsbudak’s thoughts are educational and eye-opening too. In fact, I got a few references off them Here are her posts in chronological order:

Other important and interesting references:

Ms Fix-It

2009 April 9

This too too cute for words


(URL source)

I’m particularly taken not with Kitty’s handymeow credentials but rather her penchant for standing up… much like

Prairie Dogs
Prairie dog standing and facing camera
(phot source)

or Meerkats

meerkats information photo facts pictures
(source)
[EDIT: I am rather taken with this non-standing phot too]
and Mongooses
Art print: Banded Mongoose Sits Upright To Get a Better Look Things; a National Geographic photograph by Beverly Joubert
(source)

Seems like this peculiar trait is specific to Japanese cats:

Japanese Standing Cats


Cats have always been very popular in Japan.

Products like Hello Kitty and famous anime movies like Kiki’s Delivery Service are great examples of how much the Japanese adore their feline friends.

Cats are cool and all, but nothing weirds me out more than when a cat does something that is very human-like, such as standing upright on its hind legs.

cat-standing Japanese Standing Cats picture

We came across three great videos showing weird cats that can stand for quite some time.

Cute and adorable… sure.

Completely creepy and unnerving… absolutely.

(URL source)

Ultrasonicat and the ARF munster

2009 April 5

Earlier today we brought the home coots Bam Bam and Teddy for a visit to their favourite place – the veterinary clinic.

Teddy went out a full-fluffed cat but came home missing both his flank fuzz.

Teddy_20090405_005_DSC_0005x
Teddy_20090405_005_DSC_0005y

We subscribe to the belief that beyond the age of 8, home cats – especially strictly indoors only cats, being geriatic, should not get jabs (source) anymore, due to the attendant risks.

However, annual checkups are still necessary. Because Teddy had bladder stones when he was three, and in 2007 was diagnosed with internal bladder wall bleeding and 2 kidney stones, we were concerned about possible complications. So today, an ultrasound and bloodwork was done on him. He now spots new fashion and it is confirmed that while there are (miraculously) no stones in his bladder and kidneys, that his left kidney and bladder looks ok, his right kidney is in stage 2 CRF. Analysis on his urine will return in a few days’ time, which will determine if he needs medication for any related infection. Thereafter, he will be put on a fortekor schedule, just like Bam Bam.

Bam Bam’s been to the vet 3 times in as many months. For him, he’s in a better situation than his brother. Because of the positive outcome from his first review 3 months ago, he’s been on a fortekor reduction schedule. From being on 0.5 fortekor since 2007, he’s gone to 0.25 pill per day and now 0.25 pill every other day. However, that seems to be the limit for him. His next review is in 3 months’ time.

As the vet recommended, we will start them both on k/d. As they both hate k/d, we’re not sure how long we can keep them on it. Luckily, the vet has offered an alternative should k/d not be accepted this time either – phosphate binding agents as the maximum recommended phosphate content should be no more than 0.04% of the diet. But we’ll cross that bridge when we come to it.

Next up, Joey and Rheilly’s turn at the vet in 2 weeks’ time. As for Philly, we haven’t forgotten the goofy one and will blog about his situation separately.

Becky had visitors

2009 April 5
by calsifer

Becky_20090404_006_DSC_0015_01x
Becky had her first potential adopter visit yesterday, a family of 4, with 1 girl and 1 boy. We were actually cautiously hopeful that it might work at first. We had arrived a bit earlier to prep her. When I approached her perch where she was lounging, she stood up to greet me and vocalised. Her vocalisation wasn’t the surprise since she was quite the chatty girl before she was ensconced in the cattery. The surprise was that she had bothered to get up and even greet me, the first time that she acknowledged us since she entered the cattery.

But she didn’t quite endear herself to her visitors, as she took to presenting her back to all and sundry. But this was not before she took a quick swipe at the boy when he simply put his finger in ftont of her. Looksl like she’s still not quite ready to come out of her shell, Still a few grumps to work out there.

Foster Mum’s Homeseeker: Kanly, lovely doggy needs a home

2009 April 5
by calsifer

Kanly-Dog_Foster_20090404_013_DSC_0152x

Kanly is a 8 month old black female puppy, medium-large size. She is sterilised and seeking a permanent home.

Kanly-Dog_20090404_001_DSC_0145x

Temperament: Friendly, trusting, affectionate, and calm. Does not bark. Shy with men.

Kanly-Dog_Bonnie_20090404_001_DSC_0150x
Kanly seems ok with cats. The orange blob in the lower right is Yo-yo aka Bonnie, a female ginger kitty in the cattery.

Her Story

Kanly was picked up of the streets as a young pup  5-6 months ago by a young brother and sister pair. She lived in a HDB flat happily, and without problems as she does not bark.

However, as she grew and grew, her family’s neighbours decided they would not tolerate her presence and made a complaint to HDB. Of course, the ultimatum was issued to her young owners. The kids were distraught but luckily, they were able to seek help. Kanly was rescued by Noah’s Ark and is now being fostered by Foster Mum.

Kanly is a victim of the same draconian HDB pet rules that threaten cats. As such, she cannot be rehomed to someone living in HDB.

ENQUIRIES: ADOPTION AND PROCEDURE
Please email sephycat@gmail.com with the following:

  • your name
  • contact
  • a summary of your background and experience with dogs

Serious adopters only, please. All info will be treated in confidence and forwarded to Kanly’s guardian.

Rehomer Joke-Courtesy and respect

2009 April 5
by calsifer

A real life event that just happened this week.

We got an email. There was nothing in it that actually addressed us minions. Anyway, I scrolled through it in case it was important since it was related to kitty adoptions. It turned out to be a forward of a potential adopter’s email, and it was originally addressed to metta cattery.

I noted that we got the second forward of this email. So anyway, I responded thus:

Dear Ms XXX,

Why did you forward your communication to us without the usual courtesy preamable? Have you got the wrong email address? We are not associated with metta cattery in any way, in case you didn’t notice.

In any case, we do not adopt cats out to anyone who allow cats to roam corridors due to the attendant risks.

We got a reply… an apology which was nice, but it was prefaced with this:

Dear Ms ___, ( I would love to address you but unfortunately, you didn’t leave you name/ contact typical in a formal email)

What does the lack of a “name/ contact typical in a formal email” has anything to do with courtesy? When writing, to corporations, recruiters or even the newspaper forum, for example, do we know the name of the actual human being who reads our letters or emails? That doesn’t stop us from composing courtesy preamble of the “Hi, I ‘m interested in…” or “Dear Sir/Mdm, I wish to…” ilk for these typically formal email, does it?

What really tickled me was then this person’s request that we “respect” her family’s style of “bringing up” cats, supposedly their intention, I believe INSISTENCE, to let their cat free-roam.

Head-in-the-sand syndrome, and no, this family is not the among the typical demographic that allows pet cats to free-roam. However, typical of families who allow pet cats to free-roam, they are probably ignorant, either by choice or luck, about the unhappiness it could cause their neighbours.

For reference, here’s some real life cases of complaints due to pet cats allowed to roam the corridors: Toothpicks in pot, Taking in cats, Shaking hands. Don’t forget that free-roaming pet cat issues often implicate genuine community cats at the cost of their lives.

As a TNRM minion, I have utterly no respect for such an attitude of course, but I will not bother responding to her since

You can’t make someone care

Area1: New cat – tabby male

2009 April 4
by calsifer

On the morning of 7 March, on the way out to service the Area3 kitties, we sighted a scaredy boy:
Tabby_Area1_20090307_20090307_003_DSC_0013x

He made straight for the school compound between Areas 2 and 1. From the way he made straight for the entry point, it was clear he knew the lay of the land.
Tabby_Area1_20090307_20090307_005_DSC_0015x

Later that same day, we would find out from D that she had also sighted him the night before in Area2.

We next sighted him well within Area1 in the night of 28 Mar 2008, still as scaredy, but not as unapproachable. Unlike the first time when he scooted all the way into his safe zone, that night he was content to observe us from the bushes he rushed into.

We’re going to try to get him de-mojoed, as usual, if he sticks around. Given his size, I wonder if he was the same scaredy kitten we caught sight of once, within the school compound in January. In fact, I wonder if he might be Bradley’s sibling.

Area3: Pierre, honorary clan member

2009 April 4
by calsifer

Meet Pierre.
Pierre_20090221_003_DSC_0378x

He is a community cat whose home range abuts Marty and Henna’s tuft. Like them, he’s been around since before or during SARS.

His home consists of a plaza where members of the public sit and chat. He’s actually a very popular fixture and often sits quietly by chatting couples or groups of friends in the evening. As they chat, people who stroke or pet him, and he enjoys the attention, though he won’t demand it. He’s friendliness and politeness personified. Still we believe that he did not survive this long by being oblivious. He’s hardly ever sighted in the daytime and we notice that once he’s had food, he will hide in the bushes that line the plaza perimeter.

Because of the very high traffic volume of his home, we don’t stick around, to avoid attracting the wrong type of attention to him. So we do not have photos of him, until this encounter when we had a camera good enough to take some viewable pictures.

There used to be another 2 or 3 other cats sharing his home, likely his family as they are tabby white like him. They are all sterilised (but not by us minions). But we’ve not sighted them for a long time. The most recent news we heard from A is that a resident, a very cute and dainty tabby female was found dead nearby, either because of road accident or pesticide.

Pierre_20090221_005_DSC_0380x

We don’t feed Pierrie as he’s obviously got his supply line down pat. As it turns out, one of his supplier is A from Area2.

Area2: Robby

2009 April 4
by calsifer

This is the nearest to a viewable picture I managed of Robby, the cat we first encountered while trying to get Brina’s family de-mojoed.

Robby_20090123_03x

We’ve not sighted him since. The probable reason is he’s a free-ranging virile male just like Stanley was. But I’m tagging him as an area2 cat for convenience. We expect he’ll make guest appearances until we can pin down his schedule and his mojo thereafter.

We named him Robby due to his striking resemblance to Bobby, down to the white diamond adorning the nose of their tabby-masked faces.