Another letter in response to the article: Canine Control. The Stray Dilemma For Animal Groups
This story was printed from TODAYonline
Friday • August 15, 2008
Letter from Jill Hum
I REFER to “Microchipping helps AVA in management of strays” (Aug 11).
The Agri-Food and Veterinary Authority (AVA) said that it culls stray dogs “to manage the population which poses a risk to transmission of rabies should this be introduced into Singapore” .
Surely there must be a better and less drastic method to combat the threat of rabies than culling?
Anecdotal evidence has shown that sterilisation and not culling is the most effective way to manage the stray population, so why the insistence on culling?
The AVA also said that “even strays which have been sterilised should be properly licensed and homed and not be returned to the environment”.
While I agree with this, I hope theAVA also realises that it is impossible to find homes for all sterilised strays. There are just too many of them. In the meantime, there is no choice but to return those that cannot be rehomed to their original environment.
Animal welfare organisations take the time, trouble and money to sterilise strays to control the population. To cull even sterilised strays is like saying that these strays do not have the right to live.
I urge the AVA to adopt a more compassionate and enlightened approach towards the management of these strays.