Category Archives: Americas

US & continental news and happenings

Appeal: Stop “green” Toyota from killing the US climate change bill

Toyota is the world’s largest car maker. Its Prius is the definitive green vehicle. But disturbingly, Toyota is not as green as its reputation. In the US, it is one of the lobbies attempting to kill the US senate bill on climate change.

Please read this and then spend a moment of your online time to send a message to Toyota please.

From saveourenvironment.org:

Tell Toyota: Stop Blocking Clean Energy!

The Chamber of Commerce is using the member dues of companies like Toyota to kill the clean energy bill.

Other companies have quit the Chamber in protest, but Toyota refuses to act.

Our goal is 20,000 petition signers by October 30th.

Add your name now to ensure your letter gets hand-delivered to Toyota’s US headquarters!

There are only a few days left to add your name before saveourenvironment.org deliver the letters to Toyota’s US Headquarters in New York City.

Click here to sign now and help us reach 20,000 signatures by October 30th.

This is a message you can send to friends concerned with the environment:

Of all the companies that might help defeat the Senate climate bill, I never thought it would be the maker of the Prius hybrid!

But it’s true. Toyota is helping fund a campaign to block clean energy, and I need your help to stop them. Click here to get the story:

http://ga3.org/campaign/tell_toyota_to_quit

Here’s the deal… Toyota is a prominent member of the Chamber of Commerce which has launched a massive campaign to kill the new climate change bill. The Chamber’s campaign is funded by its members – including Toyota.

As one of the most powerful lobbies in Washington, the Chamber of Commerce’s war on the climate change bill poses a very real threat to the future of our planet.

The good news is that many companies (including Apple, GE, PG&E, Nike and Levi Strauss & Company) have already resigned from the Chamber in protest. But so far Toyota has refused to join them.

Personally, I find it shocking that a company that has made millions on their reputation as a leader in green technology would so brazenly oppose climate change legislation.

That’s why I just signed a petition urging Toyota to put its money where its mouth is and quit the Chamber of Commerce now.

It would mean a lot to me if you’d consider adding your name as well. Will you check it out?

Click here to find out more:

http://ga3.org/campaign/tell_toyota_to_quit

Thanks so much for anything you can do to help me to expose Toyota’s hypocrisy!

More background info about the workings of putting the climate change  legislation through the grind of the US Senate here on treehugger.com.

Horses: Blinkers in New York

Filched off Dawn’s blog.

Horses do work very hard for people… it’s a crying what we do to them. Flog a dead horse indeed.

Monday, March 23, 2009

Blinders

I was just sent this video about horses that are used for carriage rides in New York City. Incidentally, I went by a horse show today and saw some horse rescue groups. Some of the horses were kept in such horrific conditions that they are now blind. One was tied to a stall for so long that even though it is no longer tied by its neck, apparently it doesn’t know it. You can visit the Horse rescue group at Horsenet They also have a bunch of cats on the premises, almost all of which are already sterilised..

BaltimoreSun 20090311: Federal Hill house auction to benefit animal shelter

No one lives forever. In facing our mortality, this is something that should bother any responsible pet parent: What happens to your animals after you die?

Friday, March 13, 2009

What happens to your animals after you die?

Here is an interesting story about a man stated in his will that he wanted his house sold after his death. The money raised is to go to a charity to look after dogs whose owners have died. That’s one of the issues facing older pet owners – they may want to have dogs or cats with them but worry what happens if they should die before the animals.

www.baltimoresun.com/news/local/baltimore_city/bal-md.ci.dog11mar11,0,2836709.story

baltimoresun.com

Federal Hill house auction to benefit animal shelter

Man leaves property to help care for dogs whose owners have died

By Jacques Kelly

March 11, 2009

Only a few Federal Hill neighbors knew Kenneth Munzert’s idiosyncrasies. He owned a silver-blue Bentley but preferred to walk in Baltimore. He sailed on the Queen Mary 2 but collected soap from hotels he visited. He lived in a $1 million house but wrote numerous letters on old fliers.

Munzert, who died last year at age 88, had no close family and left his principal asset, his home overlooking the harbor, to an animal charity pledged to protect his German shepherd, Beauregard, a former stray with whom he sometimes slept on the floor.

“He was an eccentric person, and he did what he considered was right,” said the Rev. Holger Roggelin, the pastor of Zion Lutheran Church, where Munzert attended services twice weekly. “He also loved to pick a fight on any issue, politics, religion, anything. I think he actually enjoyed doing this. It was hard to gain Mr. Munzert’s confidence. He had a dry sense of humor. You never knew what he was going to say next.”

Although Munzert had worried about Beauregard’s care if his beloved dog outlived him, the animal died shortly before Munzert, who then directed that his 19th-century home be sold to protect other dogs whose owners had died. The house at 405 Warren Ave., whose facade appears in the Al Pacino film And Justice for All, will go to auction March 31 to benefit the SPCA of Richmond, Va.

“I had not made a practice of accepting responsibility for people’s pets after their death, but, after I spoke with Ken, I agreed to do so for Beau,” said Robin R. Starr, head of the Richmond SPCA. “When I heard Ken talk about his love for his dog and his fear that Beau would not be cared for were he to die first, I realized that Ken was just the sort of pet owner that we wished everyone would be.”

This year, Maryland legislators are wrestling with a proposed mechanism for owners to leave a reasonable bequest to their pets. State law is hazy on the issue.

Munzert was raised on Baltimore Street on the west side. His father, a druggist, sent him to Staunton Military Academy after he and his wife separated. He studied diligently and went on to earn an engineering degree at Harvard University. After graduation, Munzert joined the Harvard Club and regularly rented one of its rooms.

Munzert assiduously read the Wall Street Journal until his death. He also studied German at the Zion church school in downtown Baltimore. Friends described him as a “Southern gentleman.”

Over the years, Munzert held jobs with the Regional Planning Council, the city, the old John C. Legg & Co. and Johns Hopkins Hospital, his attorney said.

According to interviews with friends, Munzert was a proud and private man. He regularly sailed to Europe, and left Beauregard – who could be obstreperous – in the care of others. He also made visits to Toronto, where he had a dentist, and to Richmond.

According to a will filed in Baltimore last month, Munzert left an estimated $990,228 – three-quarters of which is directed to animal protection groups in the U.S. and elsewhere. That amount doesn’t include his Warren Avenue house, which he told friends he bought for $25,000 about 40 years ago.

Munzert had owned properties in several Baltimore historic districts – Dickeyville, Seton Hill and Federal Hill, where he once owned several Warren Avenue houses.

Munzert’s home, one of a pair of houses built by South Charles Street department store owner Henry Wessel, is one of the largest residences in South Baltimore at nearly 4,400 square feet.

“That house is a treasure waiting to be touched,” said a neighbor, Mary Della, who lives in the other home constructed by the department store owner. “He loved it. And I can see him fixing the roof, attired in a summer seersucker suit.”

Restaurateur Wayne Brokke rented an apartment from Munzert in the 1970s.

“As sloppy as he was in that house, he was careful with his finances,” Brokke said. “He also loved making apartments nice for his tenants.”

Starr, the SPCA director to whom Munzert left his personal effects, walked through the house recently and found Beauregard’s ceramic food bowl, inscribed: “To Man’s Best Friend – His Dog.”

It now rests on her desk.

Farewell, Socks. RIP.

Dear former first cat, Socks of the Clintons, late of the Curries, has passed on, aged 20. And it seems the Clintons aren’t the monsters they were made out to be for his ending his days with Betty Currie. Only the people directly involved knows the truth, so let sleeping kitties lie.

Rest in peace, Socks.

(with thanks to this blog)

Black kitties need love too

Did you know?


Black cats and kittens are the most likely to be passed over for adoption? Black cats are also the most likely to be euthanized at shelters and because they are harder to find homes for, the least likely to be rescued.

Click here to read on.

I love the Top Ten Reasons to Adopt a Black Cat included at the source page.

Do visit the home site, Kitten Rescue for more, especially if you live in the Los Angeles area.

NYT 20081017: In Hard Times for Humans, Hardships for Pets, Too

The ongoing crisis is causing hardships for all but really, when abandonment is rampant in good times, leading to an annual cat and dog kill rate of 21,000 in Singapore, what more can we expect when poo hits the fan and people have difficulties with money? As a reminder that pets are not ornaments or possessions but members of the family, I quote the closing section of this New York Times article:

But some people may find that as their savings evaporate, their need for companionship may grow stronger. This weekend at Madison Square Garden, the Mayor’s Alliance for NYC’s Animals will be holding its annual Adopt-a-Cat day, with hundreds of cats and kittens looking for new homes. Prospective owners can fill out a survey that will color-code their personalities to match with available animals.

On average, a cat costs $1,000 a year to maintain, compared with about $1,500 a year for a dog, Ms. Levine said. Having a pet can bring healthy returns, especially during bear markets.

“They comfort us; they don’t care if your 401(k) lost money today,” Ms. Saul of Petfinder.com said. “They’re one of the few people in the family who are not going to be stressed out about what you did with your money.”

(Click here to read full article)

Help Alabama post-office cat keep his home

Apparently, the phenomenon of complainants causing problems for community cats isn’t a Singaporean-only trait, small comfort that it is.

Worse is the stranger phemon of authorities’ willingness to bend like pretzels for 1, that’s o-n-e, 1 sole (not very strong) complainant against an animal who doesn’t bother anyone and is more than tolerated by the silent majority. One woman doesn’t want Sammy in the post office he calls home because she’s highly allergic.

You’d have to wonder: how much time does she spend in the post office compared to Sammy that the U.S Postal Office has to do her will? What would the U.S. Postal Service someone comes along and complains she’s highly allergic to the materials used in the stamps being sold? And I thought it was bad enough that Singapore has a town council chief who advocates a zero cat policy. Bureaucratic tail-chasing isn’t such a uniquely Singapore trait after all. Oh joy.

Go to Dawn’s blog and read Cat banned from Post Office to watch the vid report. Read more reporting here: Post office feline sparks cat fight in small Alabama town

P O Box 173, Notasulga, Alabama 36866, United States of America.

Palin: Take Consistent and Firm Stand Against Moose Poaching

Another example of Palin’s disregard for wildlife aka the eco-system and the environment.

Palin: Take Consistent and Firm Stand Against Moose Poaching

Target: Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin
Sponsored by: Care2
The backstory to Sarah Palin’s accusations against her former brother-in-law, Trooper Mike Wooten, reveals how Palin and her family have shown utter disregard for wildlife – unless it can be used to her political advantage!

According to the Troopergate investigation, Palin’s sister Molly got a permit and invited her then-husband, Trooper Wooten, to join her on a moose hunting trip. When it came time to actually shoot the moose, Molly had no interest and asked Wooten to take the shot – even though it is illegal to shoot an animal under someone else’s permit. After the shooting, the Wootens brought the moose to Palin’s father for him to butcher.

Sarah Palin and her family had no issue with asking Wooten to illegally kill the moose under his wife’s permit, nor did they have a problem butchering or eating it. But once Sarah Palin decided she could use the moose killing to attack her former brother-in-law, she did.

Palin needs to know: Moose are not political pawns – they are majestic animals and deserve to be treated humanely!

What a quotable quote from the Palin one:

When I look every day, the big oil company’s building is right out there next to me, and it’s quite a reminder that we should have mutually beneficial relationships with the oil industry.

Who’s palling around with questionable elements? I just don’t get how McCain reconciled getting a running mate with a completely different take from his on such an important issue as the environment, and worse, start to lean towards her warped reasoning for palling around with the grease boys, and spurt more oil in Alaska.

What a palin in the neck. I really really hope Americans aren’t that stupid.

Wolves under Pall(in) of slaughter

Dawn posted this. I feel very disheartened to know that after 8 continuous years George W Bush and his wars on terror and the environment (with the second 4 coming out of nowhere), we may get even more of the same… or worse. Talk about the difference between a pitbull with lipstick and a hockey mum. I do not mind either in the White House, just as long as he/she does what is right and needed. But with Mrs Palin, lipstick may well grease the barrel mouths of both hunting rifles and patriot missiles alike, oil-drilling bits and the marker pens scribbling denial of climate change. It will also mark the day my zombified faith in humanity and reason dies yet again.

Thursday, October 2, 2008

Defenders of Wildlife Advertisement

This is certainly very disturbing. Shooting wolves from planes? Factcheck does add some clarifying details, but it certainly seems that most of it is true. Shooting animals is already terrible in my book – shooting animals with an unfair advantage is much, much worse.

I left a comment too, with links attached:

This has been going for a goodly number of years. It is SLAUGHTER pure and simple, just like the Japanes/Nowegian/Icelandic whale killing.

Wolves are supposed to be protected – a CITIZENS initiative banned aerial gunning since 1996, but the last two governors forced through aerial hunting of wolves as necessary protection for prey animals and people, when it is human hunters who are decimating them and taking more lives for useless trophies than the wolves do to survive. (Ref: Aerial wolf hunting flies again in Alaska)

Again, like whale slaughtering, aerial wolf gunning is something that the general public would disapprove of but is continuing due the sheer power of lobby and political pandering.

Shooting one wolf kills many even without the aerial advantage of increasing the potential of shooting more than one.

The wolves of Alaska are extremely disadvantaged. This is extra cruel for the species’ survival especially if it is one or both of the alpha pair that gets shot since only the alpha have the right to breed. Due to the social hierarchy of wolf packs, the pack disintegrates under the intense sudden stress to the social fabric. The remaining pack members will likely disperse, and die one by one. If the alpha female has new babies – the young pups starve to death.

There’s quite a few sites and movements to overturn this barbarism. Disturbing, it is being applied to bears as well. Even more perturbing, other states with strong hunting lobbies are trying to ape them.

Good ref site: http://www.alaskawolfkill.com/

Another one: http://gristmill.grist.org/story/2008/8/31/22337/7183

While I am aware that the other ticket may not be the ideal answer, the question is do we really really need more of the same old beating around the bush, all that whacking the environment senseless, generating war business  and tax breaks for those who don’t need tax breaks?

I feel the answer can only be a “Yes” if we want to see more and worse of the same problems the current Ptesident of the United States has shovelled onto the world. We’ve seen enough of the George W Bush version of governing, and it ain’t making the world better in my books. But the cruz is of course: How stupid is the American voter?

(Source: Non Sequitur by Wiley Miller. Click on the comic to view the original)

PS: Visit this site for more info on voting for conservation: League of Conservatiob Voters. They have scorecards, reports and the lowdown on candidates and current office holders of all stripes, from the President down to lil’ old governors wielding lipstick and hockey sticks.

NYT: Dogs Like Us

This is a 2006 article on the New York Times, a bit old chronologically but content-wise still as fresh. It’s a perfect companion to Japan: The horrors behind your made-to-order best friend, in giving the blunt-honest perspective on the pet-dog arena from a dog-lover in America about the dog-loving population, breeds, and the pooches themselves. I guess in a way, this is a cry for people to step back from the notion of looks and pedigree, and give non-perfect animals, especially those who are not first choice candidates a chance.

Going off on a slight tangent, I recently watched Life After People, a programme postulating what happens should people disappear off the face of the earth one day. Invariably, the various fates of animals, pets and wildlife both, were also discussed. Unsurprising, the program argues that pet dogs, if they survive the initial bewilderment and starvation, will have their best chances if they can make it out of their former homes. However, the ability to thrive and flourish will be greatly affected by the survivors’ physical traits. Breeds that have been bred (to me) out of true from the real canine form as nature intended (squat-legged, short-legged, flat-faced, stiff-limbed, shrunken, furless, etc) will probably not be among the successful survivors simply because their physical traits will impede their ability to survive.

This observation on the program ties in so well with parts of the article:

… dogs are the most plastic of species … some remarkable varieties of dogs have been created to serve our notions of beauty, novelty, companionship and service.

… form has trumped function.

Such design flaws … have enduring consequences for individual dogs, their progeny …

How portentous.

Maybe there will come a day, before they are abandoned to a life without people, dogs will finally be dogs again.

So much for tangents. for the now and the present, it is more important to know what one is getting into when looking for a pet dog. I especially like how the article closes:

… here’s a few tips that can save you some heartache and vet bills, particularly if the dog you have in mind is purebred…

If every dog buyer did such research, it would also help shut down the 5,000 puppy mills that, according to the Humane Society, provide most of the half-million purebred dogs sold through pet stores and the Internet. Poorly regulated, unsanitary factories in which females are imprisoned their entire lives, puppy mills survive because people get charmed by that puppy in the window.

… faulty dogs can’t be readily exchanged or resold. They can be “given up” to an animal shelter, and they are, at the rate of about four million dogs each year, this soothing phrase disguising the end of 50 percent of them — a gas chamber or a lethal injection.

We owe our dogs more than this. After all, it is we who have shaped them. Even when we err, they continue to put their trust and their lives in our hands.

The article (emphasis mine):

Op-Ed Contributor

Dogs Like Us

Published: February 13, 2006
Kelly, Wyo.

THE 130th Westminster Dog Show comes to New York today, with its thousands of contestants, ranging in size from two-pound Chihuahuas to 120-pound Great Danes. As the highly groomed dogs prance down the runways of Madison Square Garden — the floor-length coats of the Afghan hounds swaying, the teased coiffures of the poodles bouncing — it’s hard not to think of a fashion show.

In the case of dog shows, a given breed’s parent club sets the standard for the breed’s look or style. These standards describe an ideal specimen and are supposed to relate a dog’s form to the original function it performed. But given that dogs are the most plastic of species, and people are inventive, some remarkable varieties of dogs have been created to serve our notions of beauty, novelty, companionship and service.

Unfortunately, in some breeds, form has trumped function. The Pekingese and the bulldog, whose flattened faces make breathing difficult, are two examples. Such design flaws — often perpetuated by breeders trying to produce a dog with a unique look — have enduring consequences for individual dogs, their progeny and the people who love them.

Of the 180 breeds listed on one popular Web site for choosing purebred puppies, 42 percent have chronic health problems: skin diseases, stomach disorders, a high incidence of cancers, the inability to bear young without Caesareans, shortened life spans. The list is as disturbing as it is long, and poses a question: dazzled by the uniqueness of many of the breeds we’ve created, have we — the dog-owning public — turned a blind eye to the development of a host of dysfunctional animals?

Fifteen years ago, I was just such a starry-eyed dog buyer, poring over dog magazines and litters of pups registered with the American Kennel Club. Fate intervened. While kayaking on the San Juan River in Utah, I met a 10-month-old pup roaming free and making his own living in the desert. He wore no collar and looked to be a cross between a yellow Lab and who knew what — a golden retriever, a redbone coonhound, a Rhodesian ridgeback — a dog who seemed to shape-shift before my eyes. It was love at first sight.

He jumped into my truck at the end of the trip, and I brought him home to Wyoming, named him Merle and gave him his own dog door so he could come and go as he wished. His mixed genes and native intelligence took care of the rest. Merle would never have won a dog show, but his vigor and steadiness demonstrated what good genes can do, whether under the influence of a skillful human breeder or that oldest breeder of all — chance and natural selection.

On the other hand, buying a purebred dog from a reputable breeder is no guarantee of a healthy dog, since the existing guidelines for purebred dogs are highly subjective. Consider the German shepherd. Current American Kennel Club show standards favor those with extremely low-slung back ends. But photographs of German shepherds from earlier in the 20th century show a dog with a high rear end, one that even a lay person would call a normal-looking dog. The makeover was done to create a German shepherd that certain breeders believed would have strong forward propulsion while being aesthetically pleasing. Unfortunately, as many experts have noted, such low-slung dogs have nagging balance problems and look crippled. Dog buyers who want a shepherd — or many other Kennel Club-recognized breeds — must sort through such biomechanical and stylistic disagreements among breeders.

So if the pageantry of Westminster moves you to bring a new pup into the household, here’s a few tips that can save you some heartache and vet bills, particularly if the dog you have in mind is purebred. Investigate the track records of breeders. Meet both parents of the prospective pup. Talk with people who have bought from the breeder. And learn about the idiosyncrasies of one’s chosen breed.

If every dog buyer did such research, it would also help shut down the 5,000 puppy mills that, according to the Humane Society, provide most of the half-million purebred dogs sold through pet stores and the Internet. Poorly regulated, unsanitary factories in which females are imprisoned their entire lives, puppy mills survive because people get charmed by that puppy in the window.

Unlike the wrong computer or an automobile, however, faulty dogs can’t be readily exchanged or resold. They can be “given up” to an animal shelter, and they are, at the rate of about four million dogs each year, this soothing phrase disguising the end of 50 percent of them — a gas chamber or a lethal injection.

We owe our dogs more than this. After all, it is we who have shaped them. Even when we err, they continue to put their trust and their lives in our hands.

Ted Kerasote is the author of the forthcoming “Merle’s Door: How Dogs Might Live if They Were Free.”

Zoey’s story

Sometimes, a seemingly impossible choice presents itself. Sometimes a decision is then made that seem to fly in the face of reason. Sometimes these illogic decisions change lives.
This is the first entry about Zoey’s story, whose handicap reminds us a lot of Remy.
28-JUL-2007
A rough start
A rough start
We found this kitten sitting in the middle of the road on our way home one Friday night. We almost ran her over. I was half hoping she was a feral cat and would run the other way when I got out to check her over. But she ran right up to me and started purring. Well, what could we do but take her home and decide what to do.
I came across Zoey’s story and I just had to share it, especially after reading this (emphasis mine).
07-OCT-2007
Surgery soon
Surgery soon
On October 18th, Zoey is scheduled to be spayed and have the remainder of the bad eye removed. Her right eye will then be sewn shut. I feel a little bad about this and I’m not sure why. Its my hope that maybe through this photo diary, she will become a good will ambassador for other pets that may not seem to be perfect or the first ones to be considered for adoption. Thanks to everyone so far that has taken the time to read Zoey’s story and for your kind words of encouragement.
Stay tuned.

Puppy mill victims

I made my way down the hall to the area where all of the puppy mill dogs were now staying, I knew what to expect, since months earlier I had adopted a Jack Russell Terrier who was rescued from a puppy mill. I rounded the corner and there they were, twenty sets of terrified eyes; little souls who all their lives had been forced to live in tiny cages, in inhumane conditions. They never knew what love was, what green grass felt like on their paws, the comfort of a warm bed and the fun of a squeaky toy, instead all they knew were the harsh cold bars that kept them locked inside of a cramped cage.

I walked around visiting with each dog; some were more willing to trust a stranger and made eye contact, some even wagged their tails, but most retreated to the back of their kennels and hid until I walked away. There was one very scared tiny mini dachshund that somehow stole my heart the second I saw her. She sat in the far corner of her kennel, trying to hide under her dog bed, she would look up at me to see if I was looking at her, then immediately divert her eyes and hide again.

 

This is from the Washington Humane Society blog, off a post named Safe & Sound in Washington, DC. It is very touching to read about the puppy-mill crackdown efforts in the US, and the support the humane societies give to help rehab, care for and rehome the rescued victims.

It is even more heart-warming to read further in the post that the tiny dog, named Ruby, was adopted.

Well, it turns out our little Ruby is now the first of our twenty puppy mill dogs to find her forever home, and tonight she went home with her adopters for good.

It is a roundabout, and painful way to find a good home, and Ruby’s story says some things:

  • puppy mills are hell to dogs
  • don’t buy pets from any businesses if you can’t be sure of their supply source – don’t be party to fueling and funding puppy mills, kitten mills, rabbit mills, chinchilla mills, hamster mills or whatever-the-animal-you-fancy-for-a-pet mills
  • If you able to, adopt, not buy. There are many pet animals waiting for a home. All they need is a chance, sometimes second-chance, at life. But not all them can wait forever.

Will we see a day like this in Singapore, where mills are raided and shut down, and the animal victims rescued, cared for, and responsibly rehomed? Not to say the US is perfect in its pet mill record, but at least they are making an effort in the right direction there.

Compassion often eludes feral cats; groups out to save them

From Dawn’s blog:

Thursday, May 8, 2008

Article on cats

Here’s an interesting article about cats in USA Today.

It’s about TNRM and sterilisation. There are opponents of course, but we must also remember that the homeless animals have a right to roam, however that threatens their lives. We must also be very clear that sanctuaries are not the answer.

Therefore, the homeless animal population have to be managed within the environment they live in, ie our streets. Is it doable? from our experience, yes. It takes time and effort, but any bit helps. However, grassroots efforts like ours can only truly succeed with complementary policies that are effectively and actively implemented. This is because we can manage the existing population, but we’re powerless to stop the population growing or changing due to pet dumping, pest control roundups, or irresponsible pet owners who contribute to the problem by letting their unsterilised pets roam freely. Too bad that so far, Singaporean authorities are still waltzing around the issue, using outdated reasoning for maintaining the cat-specific ban that affects 85% of Singapore residents. Even when we have the tacit agreement of authorities to collaborate, we TNRM citizens of Singapore are treated like we’re nuisances or convenient hacket jobbers for the KS TCO, sometimes even the complainant. We definitely have a strange Love-Hate Relationship with TNRM, ala section 377A.

Look at this list in the article. It will be a happy day if we had initiatives similar to these for the homeless cats here.

  • PetSmart Charities will announce in July a $13 million spay-neuter program in Los Angeles. A clinic in Burbank, which Best Friends Animal Society in Utah also is helping fund, will sterilize 20,000 feral cats a year. PetSmart Charities has committed $862,000 to feral cat programs in Austin and Dallas as part of a $5.5 million five-year grant to Texas cities.
  • The Humane Society of the United States has just completed a CD/DVD. Effectively Managing Feral Cats will be free to 6,000 shelters, communities and feral-cat advocates through a PETCO Foundation grant. The Humane Society also holds workshops and has given thousands of dollars to a few small groups launching initiatives to protect feral cats.
  • Alley Cat Allies, which advises individuals and groups on feral-colony management, is embarking on major research to collect data about ferals and the people who help them. The non-profit group also will launch a year-long educational campaign beginning Oct. 16, National Feral Cat Day, and will push for public disclosure on how many feral cats shelters take in and euthanize to “make more transparent” every community’s “animal-control practices applied to feral cats, which most often rely on lethal control methods,” president Becky Robinson says.
  • No More Homeless Pets in Utah runs a sterilization program and works with city, county and animal control officials to develop alternatives to trapping nuisance homeless cats and depositing them at shelters — “a practice which almost guarantees euthanasia,” says the group’s Gregory Castle. A decrease in the number of cats in colonies and concurrent lower euthanasia rates have been “dramatic” in some locations, he says.

 

The full article for reference here

After receiving his rabies vaccine update, Sgt. Stripes is released into the area where he was caught earlier in the day in Burlington County, N.J. After receiving his rabies vaccine update, Sgt. Stripes is released into the area where he was caught earlier in the day in Burlington County, N.J.By Joan Fairman Kanes for USA TODAY

Compassion often eludes feral cats; groups out to save them

Feral cats — nearly invisible and often reviled — have prowled into the spotlight.

The free-roamers with an aversion to humans have grabbed headlines this spring because of a bounty on their heads in Iowa, a threatened roundup and disposal in Fairfax County, Va., and other elimination plans across the country.

But the cats also are receiving attention of a different sort.

Two feral cats warily check out traps that have been baited with tuna and placed where the cats are normally fed by caregivers in Burlington County, New Jersey. Two feral cats warily check out traps that have been baited with tuna and placed where the cats are normally fed by caregivers in Burlington County, New Jersey.

Grass-roots groups and animal-welfare organizations are directing money and energy toward helping the tens of millions of feral cats that skulk about college campuses, cluster around back-alley trash bins, swarm among the rocks at beach communities and colonize the nether-reaches of suburban parks, military installations and abandoned barns and fields:

•PetSmart Charities will announce in July a $13 million spay-neuter program in Los Angeles. A clinic in Burbank, which Best Friends Animal Society in Utah also is helping fund, will sterilize 20,000 feral cats a year. PetSmart Charities has committed $862,000 to feral cat programs in Austin and Dallas as part of a $5.5 million five-year grant to Texas cities.

•The Humane Society of the United States has just completed a CD/DVD. Effectively Managing Feral Cats will be free to 6,000 shelters, communities and feral-cat advocates through a PETCO Foundation grant. The Humane Society also holds workshops and has given thousands of dollars to a few small groups launching initiatives to protect feral cats.

•Alley Cat Allies, which advises individuals and groups on feral-colony management, is embarking on major research to collect data about ferals and the people who help them. The non-profit group also will launch a year-long educational campaign beginning Oct. 16, National Feral Cat Day, and will push for public disclosure on how many feral cats shelters take in and euthanize to “make more transparent” every community’s “animal-control practices applied to feral cats, which most often rely on lethal control methods,” president Becky Robinson says.

•No More Homeless Pets in Utah runs a sterilization program and works with city, county and animal control officials to develop alternatives to trapping nuisance homeless cats and depositing them at shelters — “a practice which almost guarantees euthanasia,” says the group’s Gregory Castle. A decrease in the number of cats in colonies and concurrent lower euthanasia rates have been “dramatic” in some locations, he says.

All major efforts involve trapping, neutering and returning the cats to their colonies. This method thwarts future litters and reduces the yowling, spraying and fighting that annoy humans. In the process, the cats usually are vaccinated, treated for minor problems and given a notch in the ear to identify they are sterile. Over time, the colony will grow smaller through attrition.

“TNR is not only the most humane, it is the most practical way of stabilizing the populations and … reducing them,” Castle says.

“Some New York neighborhoods no longer have feral colonies, or the colonies are much smaller,” says the ASPCA’s Aimee Hartmann, which holds workshops throughout the city, performs hundreds of sterilizations and loans traps to groups employing the method.

Scores of other groups participating in the practice report similar results.

Opponents speak out

The TNR method is not without detractors. Many veterinarians refuse to do such sterilizations because they say cats shouldn’t live outdoors because they become victims of the elements, predators and vehicles. And some bird and conservation groups say feral cats can decimate bird and small-mammal populations and spread disease.

Advocates counter that ferals exist because house pets were set loose or escaped, they adapted to survive, had litters, and now, a generation or more removed from being house cats, they can’t be tamed. And refusing to deal with that reality leads to more litters and more cats killed once they become public nuisances, are captured, taken to shelters and euthanized because no one will adopt them, advocates say.

Moreover, most ferals don’t live short, hideously deprived lives but are quite healthy and less apt to harm wildlife than toxins and development that overtakes habitats, says Julie Levy of the University of Florida College of Veterinary Medicine, an expert in infectious disease and feral cats. When neutered and vaccinated, such animals live many years.

A right to roam free

“For a long time, the prevailing feeling was that these animals aren’t deserving of help,” Robinson says.

But attitudes are changing.

“There are people who have been taking care of these colonies for years, getting up before dawn, leaving food and water.” Once regarded as odd, they’re increasingly regarded as “unsung heroes.”

Today, a live-and-let-live attitude is taking root, she says.

A 2007 Harris survey found that 81% believe feral cats should be allowed to live out their lives roaming free.

Still, many people have never seen a feral colony and are unaware of their numbers, which, combined with strays, could be as high as 80 million, Levy says, so these animals occupy a lower rung on the public’s concern-about-creatures hierarchy.

Advocates insist the separate-and-unequal distinction is specious.

“A good proportion of these free-roaming cats were once owned, or they are one generation removed from house pets,” says Susana Della Maddalena of PetSmart Charities. “We don’t think it’s fair to exclude them from help.”

ANIMALS: PETS AND THE REST

FERAL VS. STRAY

  • Not all outdoor cats are ferals. Nancy Peterson, feral cat expert for the Humane Society of the United States, says the population known as free-roaming cats includes:
  • Indoor/outdoor cats that roam neighborhoods. These are pets, and wandering does not make them “wild.”
  • Cats that were once pets but have been abandoned or gotten lost and have learned to survive on their own or joined feral colonies. These cats, when captured, can usually be re-socialized to live with humans. But their initial reaction to being captured is often frantic, and they can be mistaken for being feral.
  • Feral cats, which are generally one generation or more removed from being house pets, and their offspring aren’t socialized to humans and can rarely be tamed. (But their kittens, if caught young, can become pets.)

ONLINE RESOURCES ON FERALS
Hundreds of websites can aid people looking for info about feral cats. Among them:

  • Alley Cat Allies maintains a comprehensive assortment of info ranging from events and conferences to basic Q&A to legalities at alleycat.org.
  • Maddie’s Fund, which finances scores of animal causes, has nearly 500 ferals articles and resources. Click here for a good starting point, for interviews with ferals experts and details about model feral programs.
  • Go to the American Veterinary Medical Association for articles and debates about feral management and the group’s official position on TNR.
  • The Humane Society of the United States has lots of feral cat information updated regularly.
  • The American Bird Conservancy says free-roaming cats kill hundreds of millions of birds a year (a charge disputed by others who say there are easier-to-catch food sources) and have launched a campaign called “Cats Indoors!!
  • No More Homeless Pets in Utah’s site, utahpets.org, has informational aids, including solutions to conflicts and trapping instructions.
  • Downloadable documents — from trapping tricks to post-surgery guide — are at FixNation.org.
  • At feralcat.com there’s info and links to many resources and guides, including how to tame a feral kitten.
  • Go to aspca.org/tnr for info and guidance from the ASPCA. There’s also a list of upcoming training sessions in New York.

SOS: Help put the nail in Canadian Seal Killing

Early this year, I had asked you to Help the seals – just 1 min of your time. Help is still needed, and this time, it seems there is hope of finally stopping this barbaric and senseless slaughter for good.

Please read this care2 message and take action. Or if you’re so inclined, follow the SeaShepherd’s guidelines and suggestions and write a letter. (It is also a great quickie cheatsheet for boning up on the situation now.)

Unsubscribe | Forward to a Friend | Take Action

care2 petitionsite actionAlert

Dear friend,

Global pressure on the seal hunting industry is working! Even while the Canadian government futilely attempts to convince the world that the hunt is humane, the European Union moves steadily towards banning imports of all seal products.

EU Environment Commissioner Stavros Dimas said that he “intends to come forward with legislation which bans the importation and sale of products derived from seals that had been… inhumanely killed.” This threat has helped force the price of seal pelts down to half of what they were a year ago.

Keep up the pressure and bring an end to seal hunting »

The Canadian government already spends millions and millions of dollars to subsidize the seal hunt, and in the process the country’s reputation continues to deteriorate. It’s time that they realize that the seal hunt is inhumane, unsustainable in the face of global warming, and economically a burden. The Canadian government would be better off investing in eco-tourism than trying to preserve the slaughter of seals.

Tell them to stop the hunt »

Thanks for taking action!

Samer
Care2 and ThePetitionSite

In addition, here are some article excerpts from the seashepherd site which you may find interesting and educational:

From “May Day” for the Seal Slaughter on May Day:

it’s a crime in Canada to witness, film or photograph the killing of a seal. Specifically it’s a violation of the “seal protection regulations.” Go figure, eh.

From Adventures in the Bizarre World of Canadian Politics:

In a world where his Holiness the Dalai Lama is described as a terrorist leader by a world power like China, it is hardly an insult to be called a terrorist by some backwoods robber baron of a premier in Newfoundland.

I don’t really know where “tofu eating terrorists” are placed on the spectrum of terrorism but there seems to be a vast chasm between the action of video-taping the slaughter of a seal and flying a passenger jet into a civilian building.

The days when the uneducated “the world owes us a living crowd”, can continue to plunder the oceans is almost over. Their awesome greed has already diminished the oceans of fish, marine mammals, sea-birds and even invertebrates and still the slaughter continues as they move on to lesser valued species after trashing the more valuable.

Columnist Jim Leger actually suggested that the only reason the seal slaughter continues is because the government refuses to give into me and that I am the reason the seals are dying. Now there’s an off the wall, over the top perspective! Jimmy boy admits that there is no other reason to support the hunt other than to oppose me. In other words, the Canadian government is spending 24 million dollars a year supporting a 6 million dollar industry just so they can say I did not whoop their ass.

From What the Phoque?:

The last time I was in the Magdalen Islands back in 1995, the sealers all got drunk and mustered up the courage to attack my crew and I in our hotel in the town of Grindstone…

… I barely escaped with my life that day so it should not be surprising that I hold little respect or sympathy for the cowards that assaulted me…

Martin Sheen, my crew and I, had gone to the Magdalen Islands to present an alternative to killing seals. We had found a company in Germany that would buy naturally molted seal hairs. These transparent hollow follicles have the same characteristics as eider feathers and it could be an industry that could provide a product from an animal without the need to injure or kill the seals. In other words a cruelty free, non-lethal form of sealing. We had already discovered that the seals actually enjoyed the brushing off of their molted hairs. We had come to the islands to employ sealers and not to oppose them.

The sealers responded by having a meeting, getting drunk and then attacking our hotel and assaulting us. Their ringleader said that they wanted nothing to do “with a faggoty idea like brushing seals. Seal were meant to be clubbed not coddled.”

One sealer said that it was not just about the money. “It’s our one opportunity every year to get away from the old lady and the kids, have some beers with the boys and kill seals. It’s our way of life and we loves it.”

Yep, nice guys.

How many Phoque You Paul Watson Tee shirts would they need to sell to bring in the amount of money they would make from killing seals?

The Magdalen Island share of the overall seal quota was 15,000. At $32 per pelt that would bring in about $500,000 but after costs are factored in like fuel and vessel operations that amount is cut in half to about $250,000.

Of course the government subsidies and icebreaker services surpassed a million dollars for the Magdalens alone this year and the search for the missing sealer cost another three million but hey never mind, that’s taxpayer money from people with real jobs.

But considering they did not take even half their quota this year, the profit for the sealers was about $100 each if they were lucky. They did not even make enough money to cover the funeral costs for the lost sealers although they did drape the coffins in seal pelts which seemed quaintly primitive.

Two hundred thousand Phoque You Paul Watson T shirts at $25 could bring in $500,000 without fuel costs or being a burden to the tax-payer.

All anti seal-killing campaign articles on the seashepherd site.

Related:

Japan: The horrors behind your made-to-order best friend

(Source article, Japan, Home of the Cute and Inbred Dog, filched from Dawn’s blog)

What do these read like to you?

… the real problem is what often arrives in the same litter: genetically defective sister and brother puppies born with missing paws or faces lacking eyes and a nose.

There have been dogs with brain disorders so severe that they spent all day running in circles, and others with bones so frail they dissolved in their bodies. Many carry hidden diseases that crop up years later, veterinarians and breeders say.

Coveted traits like a blue-tinged coat are often the result of recessive genes, which can determine appearance only when combined with another recessive gene.

Inbreeding is a quick way to bring out recessive traits, as dogs carrying the gene are repeatedly mated with their own offspring, enhancing the trait over successive generations.

When done carefully, some types of inbreeding are safe. But in Japan, all too many breeders throw aside caution in search of a quick profit, experts in the business say. In these cases, for every dog born with prized colors, many more appear with defects, also the product of recessive genes.

… nearly half of all Labradors suffered from the deformity — four times more than the United States…

Hirofumi Sasaki, a pet store owner in the western city of Hiroshima, has seen so many defective dogs that last year he converted an old bar into a hospice to care for them. So far he has taken in 32 dogs, though only 12 have survived.

One is Keika, a deaf 1-year-old female dachshund with eyes that wander aimlessly. Her breeder was originally selling her for about $7,500 because she is half-white, a rare trait in dachshunds.

“That is an unnatural color, like a person with blue skin,” Mr. Sasaki said.

The breeder told Mr. Sasaki that he had bred a dog with three generations of offspring — in human terms, first with its daughter, then a granddaughter and then a great-granddaughter — until Keika was born. The other four puppies in the litter were so hideously deformed that they were killed right after birth.

Science fiction excerpt? Horror flick scene? No, it’s real life, happening in Japan as we speak. but it’s not just Japan, everywhere it is happening, even in Singapore. It is getting attention in Japan only because of the alarmingly high incidence of deformities and mortality rates there. Part of the problem is unscrupulous breeders who treat the animals they breed like so many money-making machines and their offspring like so much goods promising profit.

To get an idea about the animal welfare situation in Japan, here’s a list of articles on Japanese animal welfare group, ARK‘s english website.

To put things in perspective, among this list of Singapore articles and news, this one shows the horror that goes on in our fair city won’t lose to even the biggest case uncovered in the US.

Like Singapore’s laws about breeding and pet shops, what Japan has are relatively new. And like Singapore, the problem is the lack of will or resources on authorities’ part to police and enforce said laws. Where does that leave the victims? I’m not talking about the people who buy these “designer” pets. Sure they lose money, but did they have to live with sometimes painful genetic defects, if allowed to live at all? The real victims are the animals – the mothers and fathers who are made to breed at an unnaturally fast and intense rate detrimental to their health and biology, and their offspring, the poor babies who might not even live long enough to taste mother’s milk. Every breeding animal deemed useless or any babies deemed unsaleable are cruelly disposed of.

Why is this happening? As long as there are people willing to buy pets without questioning the source, the puppy mills and kitten mills, and the middleman petshops will thrive. And so will gross neglect, abuse, mistreatment, abandonment. Sometimes when no longer profitable, breeding farms, along with all their voiceless victims, are nonchalantly abandoned.

The quotes and the article, appended below, relates to dogs, but for cats too, inbreeding has caused them a ton of issues. For example, white cats with blue eyes are often blind and deaf.

Selective breeding has given us many magnificent breeds. Selective breeding has also given us many dogs with health or mental problems.

Teacup anything have health problems compounded, as being teacup is a process of breeding runts with runts. Speaking of small, I remember catching something on Channel News Asia, where the topic happened to be very small breed dogs, specfically the chihuahua. Being unnaturally small for a canine, the chihuahua bitch faces labour problems far in excess of larger breeds, and often her babies can be delivered only by Caesarian due to the violation of natural foetus to birth canal ratio of the breed. The Chihuahua’s tiny size is already a standard, imagine what a teacup-sized dog goes through during labour.

Young anything are also very fragile – especially baby animals under 3 months of age. And yet, Singapore laws only prohibit the import of animals under 3 months of age, and so locally born baby kittens and puppies may be sold before their 3rd month… which may lead to tragedies like this.

Why are such cruelties happening, you may ask. Why isn’t anyone stopping them?

The most important thing to remember, as with all else, is that the power to stop this tragedy is within US, you and me, people, common folk. Consumers. For

“If consumers didn’t buy these unnatural dogs,” said Chizuko Yamaguchi, a veterinarian at the Japan Animal Welfare Society, “breeders wouldn’t breed them.”

Abandonment, and mistreatment is part of the phenomenon of novelty pet ownership. The lucky ones get rehomed, the slightly less will end up in shelters where they may be granted as stay of execution. The thing is, there are so many animals in shelters awaiting new homes.

In Singapore, the AVA and the SPCA puts down thousands of animals every year, and some of them can’t be accused of being scraggly dirty mongrels or drain cats. In the US, 3 to 4 million dogs and cats are put to death in shelters.

There are always animals hoping for a second chance, and too often, due to overcrowding at rescue centres, many of these hopefuls are put to death, sentenced by arbitrary judgments of age, looks, and personality. So if you’re thinking of getting a pet, why not consider adoption? You will literally be saving lives.

Japan, Home of the Cute and Inbred Dog



Hidekazu Kawanabe for The New York Times

Chihuahuas are popular in Japan; this one was bred to have a blue hue. More Photos >

Published: December 28, 2006
TOKYO, Dec. 27 — Care for a Chihuahua with a blue hue?
Or how about a teacup poodle so tiny it will fit into a purse — the canine equivalent of a bonsai?

The Japanese sure do.

Rare dogs are highly prized here, and can set buyers back more than $10,000. But the real problem is what often arrives in the same litter: genetically defective sister and brother puppies born with missing paws or faces lacking eyes and a nose.

There have been dogs with brain disorders so severe that they spent all day running in circles, and others with bones so frail they dissolved in their bodies. Many carry hidden diseases that crop up years later, veterinarians and breeders say.

Kiyomi Miyauchi was heartbroken to discover this after one of two Boston terriers she bought years ago suddenly collapsed last year into spasms on the living room floor and died. In March, one of its puppies died the same way; another went blind.

Ms. Miyauchi stumbled across a widespread problem here that is only starting to get attention. Rampant inbreeding has given Japanese dogs some of the highest rates of genetic defects in the world, sometimes four times higher than in the United States and Europe.

These illnesses are the tragic consequences of the national penchant in Japan for turning things cute and cuddly into social status symbols. But they also reflect the fondness for piling onto fads in Japan, a nation that always seems caught in the grip of some trend or other.

“Japanese are maniacs for booms,” said Toshiaki Kageyama, a professor of veterinary medicine specializing in genetic defects at Azabu University in Sagamihara. “But people forget here that dogs aren’t just status symbols. They are living things.”

Dogs are just one current rage. Less consequential is the big boom in the color pink: pink digital cameras, pink portable game consoles and, yes, pink laptop computers have become must-haves for young women. Last year, it was “bug king,” a computer game with battling beetles.

A number of the booms in Japan, including Tamagotchi — basically a virtual pet that grew on a computer screen — and the fanciful cartoon characters of Pokémon, have made their way across the Pacific and swept up American children, too.

The affection for fads in Japan reflects its group-oriented culture, a product of the conformity taught in its grueling education system. But booms also take off because they are fueled by big business. Companies like Sony and Nintendo are constantly looking to create the next adorable hit, churning out cute new characters and devices. Booms help sustain an entire industrial complex, from software makers to marketers and distributors, that thrives off the pack mentality of consumers in Japan.

The same thing is happening in Japan’s fast-growing pet industry, estimated at more than $10 billion a year. Chihuahuas are the current hot breed, after one starred in the television ads of a finance company. In the early 1990s, a TV drama featuring a Siberian husky helped send annual sales rocketing from just a few hundred dogs to 60,000; sales fell when the fad cooled, according to the Japan Kennel Club. The breed took off despite being inappropriately large for cramped homes in Japan.

The United States also experiences surges in sales of certain breeds, and some states have confronted “puppy mills” that churn out popular breeds by enacting “puppy lemon laws” that prevent breeders from selling diseased animals.

But in Japan, the sales spikes are far more extreme, statistics show. The kennel club says unethical breeders try to cash in on the booms, churning out large volumes of puppies from a small number of parents. While many breeders have stuck to healthy mating practices, the lure of profits has attracted less scrupulous breeders and led to proliferation of puppy mills.

Some veterinarians and other experts cite another, less obvious factor behind widespread risky inbreeding in Japan’s dog industry — the nation’s declining birthrate.

As the number of childless women and couples in Japan has increased, so has the number of dogs, which are being coddled and doted upon in place of children, experts say. In the last decade, the number of pet dogs in Japan has doubled to 13 million last year — outnumbering children under 12 — according to Takashi Harada, president of Yaseisha, a publisher of pet industry magazines.

“Households with few or no children are turning to dogs to fill the void,” he said. “For a dog to be part of the family, it has to be unique and have character, like a person.”

Indeed, many of these buyers want dogs they can show off like proud parents. They are willing to pay top yen, with rarer dogs fetching higher prices. Coveted traits like a blue-tinged coat are often the result of recessive genes, which can determine appearance only when combined with another recessive gene.

Inbreeding is a quick way to bring out recessive traits, as dogs carrying the gene are repeatedly mated with their own offspring, enhancing the trait over successive generations.

When done carefully, some types of inbreeding are safe. But in Japan, all too many breeders throw aside caution in search of a quick profit, experts in the business say. In these cases, for every dog born with prized colors, many more appear with defects, also the product of recessive genes.

“The demand is intense, and so is the temptation,” said Hidekazu Kawanabe, one of the country’s top Chihuahua breeders. “There are a lot of bad breeders out there who see dogs as nothing more than an industrial product to make quick money.”

Awareness is so recent that the only comprehensive survey of genetic defects came out two years ago, looking at malformed hips in Labrador retrievers. The results showed that nearly half of all Labradors suffered from the deformity — four times more than the United States, according to Professor Kageyama at Azabu University, who conducted the survey.

Hirofumi Sasaki, a pet store owner in the western city of Hiroshima, has seen so many defective dogs that last year he converted an old bar into a hospice to care for them. So far he has taken in 32 dogs, though only 12 have survived.

One is Keika, a deaf 1-year-old female dachshund with eyes that wander aimlessly. Her breeder was originally selling her for about $7,500 because she is half-white, a rare trait in dachshunds.

“That is an unnatural color, like a person with blue skin,” Mr. Sasaki said.

The breeder told Mr. Sasaki that he had bred a dog with three generations of offspring — in human terms, first with its daughter, then a granddaughter and then a great-granddaughter — until Keika was born. The other four puppies in the litter were so hideously deformed that they were killed right after birth.

Ms. Miyauchi, the Boston terrier owner and a resident of the western city of Kobe, said she was appalled to learn how common inbreeding was in Japan. After the death of her second Boston terrier, she said she went looking for the breeder, but the phone number she got from the pet shop was invalid.

“No one’s really monitoring the industry,” she said.

The government concedes that oversight is poor, and passed a law in June to revoke the licenses of breeders who use dogs with genetic defects for breeding. But the Environment Ministry, which has jurisdiction over pets, says it has just four officials to monitor all of 25,000 pet shops, kennels and breeders in Japan.

The Japan Kennel Club began adding results of DNA screening onto pedigree certificates in April. But that falls short of the American Kennel Club, which discourages risky inbreeding by listing acceptable colors for each breed.

“Japan is about 30 or 40 years behind in dealing with genetic defects,” said Takemi Nagamura, president of the Japan Kennel Club.

Ultimately, animal care professionals say, the solution is educating not just breeders but potential dog owners.

“If consumers didn’t buy these unnatural dogs,” said Chizuko Yamaguchi, a veterinarian at the Japan Animal Welfare Society, “breeders wouldn’t breed them.”